文献与来源索引

ID	状态	主题	来源类型	来源标题	URL	引用线索
S01	uncertain	意志力自我损耗(ego depletion)的复制危机：Hagg	peer-reviewed	A Multilab Preregistered Replication of the Ego-Depletion Effect (PMC全文)	https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4971805/	Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., Alberts, H., Anggono, C. O., Batailler,
S02	confirmed	意志力自我损耗(ego depletion)的复制危机：Hagg	peer-reviewed	Publication bias and the limited strength model of self-control (PMC全文)	https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4115664/	Carter, E. C., & McCullough, M. E. (2014). Publication bias and the limited stre
S03	to-verify	意志力自我损耗(ego depletion)的复制危机：Hagg	peer-reviewed	A Simple, Principled Approach to Combining Evidence (Collabra: Psychology)	https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2515245918756858
S04	confirmed	目标设定理论(GST, Locke & Latham)的边界条件	peer-reviewed	Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-y	https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12237980/	Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of go
S05	to-verify	目标设定理论(GST, Locke & Latham)的边界条件	peer-reviewed	Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior (Academy of Management Journal	https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-15942-009	Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator
S06	to-verify	目标设定理论(GST, Locke & Latham)的边界条件	book	How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big (Scott Adams, 2013) —— fs.blo	https://fs.blog/scott-adams-fail-at-everything/	Adams, S. (2013). How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big: Kind of th
S07	to-verify	棉花糖实验(marshmallow test)的复制与再解释：W	peer-reviewed	Revisiting the Marshmallow Test: A Conceptual Replication Investigating Links Be	https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6050075/	Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., & Quan, H. (2018). Revisiting the Marshmallow Test:
S08	to-verify	棉花糖实验(marshmallow test)的复制与再解释：W	peer-reviewed	Delay of gratification and adult outcomes: The Marshmallow Test does not reliabl	https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11581930/	Sperber, J. F., et al. (2024). Delay of gratification and adult outcomes: The Ma
S09	uncertain	心流(flow)的神经机制证据强度——Dietrich 2004	peer-reviewed	Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow (Consciousness and C	https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1053810004000583	Dietrich, A. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow
S10	to-verify	心流(flow)的神经机制证据强度——Dietrich 2004	meta-analysis	The brain in flow: A systematic review on the neural basis of the flow state (Ne	https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35926367/	Alameda, C., Sanabria, D., & Ciria, L. (2022). The brain in flow: A systematic r
S11	to-verify	心流(flow)的神经机制证据强度——Dietrich 2004	peer-reviewed	Neural correlates of experimentally induced flow experiences (NeuroImage)	https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23959200/	Ulrich, M., Keller, J., Hoenig, K., Waller, C., & Grön, G. (2014). Neural correl
S12	to-verify	过滤气泡/信息茧房实际影响的学术争议：Pariser 原始主张	peer-reviewed	Ideological Segregation Online and Offline (The Quarterly Journal of Economics)	https://web.stanford.edu/~gentzkow/research/echo_chambers.pdf	Gentzkow, M., & Shapiro, J. M. (2011). Ideological Segregation Online and Offlin
S13	to-verify	过滤气泡/信息茧房实际影响的学术争议：Pariser 原始主张	peer-reviewed	The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and	https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322776235_The_echo_chamber_is_overstated_the_moderating_effect_of_political_interest_and_diverse_media	Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating e
S14	to-verify	过滤气泡/信息茧房实际影响的学术争议：Pariser 原始主张	book	The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You	https://hci.stanford.edu/courses/cs047n/readings/The_Filter_Bubble.pdf	Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. New
S15	to-verify	多巴胺断食被广泛误读：原始方法基于CBT的刺激控制而非字面"断食	peer-reviewed	Maladaptive or misunderstood? Dopamine fasting as a potential intervention for b	https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/lim2.54	Fei, Y.Y., Johnson, P.A., Omran, N.A.L., Mardon, A., & Johnson, J.C. (2022). Mal
S16	to-verify	多巴胺断食被广泛误读：原始方法基于CBT的刺激控制而非字面"断食	institutional	Dopamine fasting: Misunderstanding science spawns a maladaptive fad	https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/dopamine-fasting-misunderstanding-science-spawns-a-maladaptive-fad-2020022618917	Grinspoon, P. (2020). Dopamine fasting: Misunderstanding science spawns a malada
S17	to-verify	多巴胺断食被广泛误读：原始方法基于CBT的刺激控制而非字面"断食	news	Silicon Valley takes on 'Dopamine Fasting 2.0' to battle bad habits	https://abc7news.com/post/silicon-valley-takes-dopamine-fasting-20-battle-bad-habits-addiction/5685298/
S18	to-verify	Dunning-Kruger效应的方法学批评：该效应是否为自相关	peer-reviewed	How Noise and a Graphic Convention Subverted Behavioral Scientists' Explanations	https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/numeracy/vol10/iss1/art4/	Nuhfer, E., Cogan, C., Fleisher, S., Gaze, E., & Wirth, K. (2017). How Noise and
S19	to-verify	Dunning-Kruger效应的方法学批评：该效应是否为自相关	peer-reviewed	Unskilled and Unaware—But Why? A Reply to Krueger and Mueller (2002)	https://sites.lsa.umich.edu/sasi/wp-content/uploads/sites/275/2015/11/krugerdunning02.pdf	Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (2002). Unskilled and unaware—but why? A reply to Krue
S20	to-verify	Dunning-Kruger效应的方法学批评：该效应是否为自相关	peer-reviewed	A Statistical Explanation of the Dunning–Kruger Effect	https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8992690/	Magnus, J. R., et al. (2022). A Statistical Explanation of the Dunning–Kruger Ef
S21	to-verify	习惯养成所需天数：Lally et al. (2010) "66	peer-reviewed	How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world	https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.674	Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How ar
S22	to-verify	习惯养成所需天数：Lally et al. (2010) "66	institutional	How long does it take to form a habit? (UCL News)	https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2009/aug/how-long-does-it-take-form-habit
S23	to-verify	习惯养成所需天数：Lally et al. (2010) "66	meta-analysis	Time to Form a Habit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis	https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11641623/	Singh, B., et al. (2024). Time to Form a Habit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Ana
S24	to-verify	习惯回路(habit loop)模型演进：Duhigg 三段模型	book	Reader's Guide to Changing Habits (The Power of Habit 附录)	https://charlesduhigg.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Duhigg-Readers-Guide-to-Changing-Habits.pdf	Duhigg, C. (2012). The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do in Life and Business
S25	to-verify	习惯回路(habit loop)模型演进：Duhigg 三段模型	book	How To Start New Habits That Actually Stick (James Clear 官网)	https://jamesclear.com/three-steps-habit-change	Clear, J. (2018). Atomic Habits: An Easy & Proven Way to Build Good Habits & Bre
S26	to-verify	习惯回路(habit loop)模型演进：Duhigg 三段模型	peer-reviewed	Habits in Everyday Life: Thought, Emotion, and Action (Journal of Personality an	https://dornsife.usc.edu/wendy-wood/wp-content/uploads/sites/183/2023/10/Wood.Quinn_.Kashy_.2002_Habits_in_everyday_life.pdf	Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought,
S27	to-verify	屏幕时间/数字成瘾流行率（近三年权威统计）——严格区分权威机构数	institutional	Daily Screen Time Among Teenagers: United States, July 2021–December 2023 (NCHS	https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db513.htm	Zablotsky, B. (2024). Daily Screen Time Among Teenagers: United States, July 202
S28	to-verify	屏幕时间/数字成瘾流行率（近三年权威统计）——严格区分权威机构数	institutional	第55次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》(CNNIC)	https://cnnic.net/n4/2025/0117/c88-11229.html	中国互联网络信息中心. (2025). 第55次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告. 北京: CNNIC.
S29	to-verify	屏幕时间/数字成瘾流行率（近三年权威统计）——严格区分权威机构数	peer-reviewed	Smartphone addiction is increasing across the world: A meta-analysis of 24 count	https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563221004611	Olson, J. A., Sandra, D. A., Colucci, É. S., Al Bikaii, A., Chmoulevitch, D., Na
S30	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	book	Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior (Springer/Plenum)	https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7	Deci E L, Ryan R M. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavio
S31	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	peer-reviewed	JSTOR学术期刊书评(1991)评Csikszentmihalyi《Flow》	https://www.jstor.org/stable/258925	Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The psychology of optimal experience[M]. New York: Har
S32	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	institutional	APA PsycNET著录: Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)	https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-26535-000	Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow[M]. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 201
S33	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	book	Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development (Res	https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235701029_Experiential_Learning_Experience_As_The_Source_Of_Learning_And_Development	Kolb D A. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and develo
S34	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	book	Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Internet Archive原始全书)	https://archive.org/details/organizationalle00chri	Argyris C, Schön D A. Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective[M]
S35	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	peer-reviewed	明尼苏达大学学术期刊《The Power of Habit》书评(2013)	https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/jcotr/article/view/2852/2260	Duhigg C. The power of habit: Why we do what we do in life and business[M]. New
S36	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	peer-reviewed	A Behavior Model for Persuasive Design (ACM Digital Library, Persuasive 2009)	https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1541948.1541999	Fogg B J. A behavior model for persuasive design[C]//Proceedings of the 4th Inte
S37	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	blog	Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World 著录参考	https://library.mailmanhq.com/deep-work-rules/	Newport C. Deep work: Rules for focused success in a distracted world[M]. New Yo
S38	to-verify	核实9个经典理论/概念的最权威原始出处（作者/年代/原标题/载体	peer-reviewed	A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward (PubMed/Science, 1997)	https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9054347/	Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague P R. A neural substrate of prediction and reward[J]